🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.